Cho Seung-Hui, a Manchurian Candidate?

Open Letter to: Captain Eric May {has a theory about hidden numeric codes}, Alan Watt {has ideas about hidden 'elites' controlling much}, & And to others interested in the truth,

there are some numerical 'codes' in the Virginia Tech Shooting. The shooting occurred on April 16, 2007 [4.16.07], which decodes to 4+16=11, which is a significant 'fingerprint' of the 'illuminati [Per Captain Eric May's Theory].' We also see that he killed 32 people, and then stopped. He then became his 33 rd victim, with his suicide. This is also a significant Masonic number [Alan Watt's idea].

So we see two 'coincidences' that point to the 'Secret Societies.' The chance of 'dumb luck' of this is the product {for two independent events} of the chances of each event by itself. The chance of an '11 Day [A date that calculates to '11' as follows: [#of Month]+[#of first digit in the date]+[#of second digit in the date] = 11, an example follows: Sept 11, 2001, calculates to 9+1+1=11, and July 31,2007 is 7+3+1=11.]' is about 30/365 {since there are about 30 dates in a year that equal an '11 day'} or about 1/12. The chance of murdering exactley 33 people is a little more difficult to determine. We note, Cho Seung-Hui was conscious of the Columbine Massacre number, so he would want to surpass it [Given the competitive nature of today's society]. They murdered about 12 to 14 people [if memory serves], so Cho would want at least 15 people. Also, the 1966 Deadly Tower UT Shooter, murdered 16 people [if memory serves], so this puts the minimum goal of Cho to at least 17 people. So the "Cho Universe of Victims Number" would be any number in the set:{17, 18, 19, 20, ..., 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, ..., 50, 51, 52, .... , 99, 100, 101, ... (an on and on)}. [Note: Cho would be limited by the amount of ammunition he could conveniently carry, and also note that Cho shot each Murdered Victim at least 3 times, if his 9mm Glock [used in most killings] had 17 bullet clips, 32 victims would be about 96 bullets, which is 6 Glock Ammunition Clips {6*17=102 Bullets}. He had a 22 Caliber Pistol [used for mainly wounding, is my understanding], which needed clips as well, if he had 4 clips for it he would be 'loaded' with a total of 10 clips. His Vest could hold 10 to 12 clips, so we see the 'A more realistic' [after this analysis]' "Cho Universe of Victims Number" is any number in the set: {17, 18, ..., 30, 31, 32, 33, ..., 50, 51, 52, ..., 100 [at this last # it would be 1 Bullet per Victim, but is an unlikely outcome]}; and a 'most realistic set' is {27 (to beat the old record by 10, since 10 is culturally significant), 28, ..., 33, 34, ... , 50 [two bullets per victim]}, so a given number like '33' is 1/24 [24 possible outcomes from 27 to 50 Victims], but if smaller numbers are more likely, then '33' victims has a chance of 1/14 [14 possible outcomes from 27 to 40 Victims]. So the real chance is between these two numbers.

So together, we see the chance for these two coincidences {maybe they are or maybe they are not coinicidences} is between {1/12}*{1/14}=1/168 and {1/12}*{1/24}=1/288. Note: If you went to Las Vegas and had odd's of winning like that, you will lose, in other words, for these numerical outcomes to occur, we would need something to increase the probability. So I would think something else influenced these outcomes, which could be Cho's own ideas [Did he read Masonic Literature {33 is significant to them}? {for this we need to get a list of Library Books he checked out and courses he took, and Websites he visited} Was he familiar with Captain May's Coding Theory? {What Websites did Cho visit?] or Cho's subconscious [Was he hypnotically controlled by the illuminati [Check Adam Weishaupt] to then leave illuninati 'fingerprints? (these numerical Codes)' This needs to be investigated.].

That he was 'brainwashed [to kill himself as the 33 rd victim and to choose 4.16.07 {decodes to 11}]' seems more likely when we consider he may have been molested as a youngster, so he could have multiple personalities, created by trauma. Evidence that he was molested {trauma] can be gleaned from his Play "Richard McBeef." Also from Cho's video {sent to GE's NBC Network} he seems to be exhibiting another personality from how the students described him as 'very quiet.'

This Molestation {to create trauma and thus multiple personalities} evidence is discussed below.

But first note: The original movie entitled the 'Manchurian Candidate' starring Frank Sinatra [1962 production date] was about American Captured Soldiers in the Korean War [Cho Seung-Hui was Korean, is this significant in regards to being brainwashed? What did he do in Korea as a youngster? This needs to be determined.] being brainwashed and hypnotically controlled by the North Koreans, to then become 'Sleeper Assasins' who could be awakened by the 'Right Code Word' to trigger the 'Assasin Personality [all of this is unconscious to the other multiple personalities, created by trauma].'

A new 'Manchurian Candidate' movie, starring Denzel Washington [released in 1998 if memory serves], was updated, but the idea of people being hypnotically Controlled, with trigger words to awaken a given personality [of someone with multiple personalities, also created by trauma based conditioning] to do mayhem remained the same.

Cho Seung-Hui seems to have been sexually molested as is evidenced in his Play 'Richard McBeef.'Was this done to create rage and multiple personalities [trauma based conditioning?], so he would become a real Manchurian Candidate? These questions need to be investigated.

From the Play, 'Richard McBeef', it seems that Cho Seung-Hui takes on the character of 'John' [the 13 year old step-son]. 'John' seems to rage against his Step-Father [from the Play], 'Richard McBeef.' Why does 'John [Really this is Cho talking]' have all this rage and anger against his 'Step-Father?'

'John' accuses 'Richard McBeef' of being 'a Catholic priest!'

[Note: Priest's are referred to as 'Father,' but they are not anyones biological Father, so in a sense they could be referred to as a 'Step-Father.' So is Cho actually angry at some Priest for molesting Him? Did he attend a Catholic School? Did he have any dealings with Catholics? These questions need to be researched, and answered; especially in light of information about pedophile Priests recently coming to light.]

'John [Cho]' further says 'I will not be molested by an aging balding overweight pedophilic stepdad [this could actually be a reference to a Priest] named Dick.' [Is this name chosen, by Cho, since it is a slang term for 'Penis,' and a 'Penis' was used to rape Cho?] 'John's' solution for stopping this molestation activityis to 'kill Dick.' Later, we see Cho, thought of everyone as that 'Molester' and they needed to be stopped.

We know how his solution played out with 32 innocent people being shot to death and many others wounded.

'John' further says 'stop it, Michael Jackson;' [Note: Michael Jackson has long been accused as a Pedophile, but never convicted. Cho, seems to be using this name as a symbol for any Pedophile.] this would seem to be a call to stop the molesting activities against Cho.

Further in the Play, even the Mother, 'Sue', suspects the 'Step-Father Richard {Dick "The Penis"} McBeef' of: 'Are you a bisexual psycho rapist murderer!' And later, 'Sue' comes to the conclusion that: 'Oh my god! You are a pedohile [in reference to 'Richard McBeef {The Step-Father (Priest)}']!

Later in the 'Play' we see the mind of Cho coming up to the surface: 'John [Cho]' says 'I hate him. Must kill Dick. Must kill Dick. Dick must die. Kill Dick... Richard McBeef. [Note: In Cho's twisted mind, his hate for the Pedophiles was transfered onto everyone. All the people he shot were 'Dick [The Molester]'... You don't think I can kill you, Dick? You don't think I can kill you? Gotcha. Got one eye... Got the other eye.' [Here, we see Cho is visualizing his future rampage.]

It seems Cho's mind was damaged by some molester. Further, he may have had some otherpsychological problem, where he could not think clearly about who should have too face justice. His solution, punished the wrong party. The real guilty party should be uncovered. Are they Priests? We need to investigate further.

Read the play 'Richard McBeef' so you can see for yourself, about what I write.